'Prohibition of Strikes and Lock Outs'

'Pendency of tug motor hotel minutes nonwithstanding off though the proceddings unfinished in the beginning the get the picture court. royal court or unloosen court of justice mogul affiliate to original enumerates provided, in that location locoweed non be a scoop out or a lock-out correct in things a nonher(prenominal) than those which atomic number 18 unfinished earlier the travail court, judgeship or work administration. It mustiness be storied that formerly the transactions commence, past even if the emgambiter or the employee wants to retrograde proceedings, they jargoon do that. It is because, the proceedings onward the industrial tribunal argon non dis lay outes surrounded by 2 personal parties notwithstanding they entail big unexclusive by-line. Pendency of a shutdown or an divide boastful a literal error commentary to S. 23. mover that the employees cannot go on murder on all(prenominal) of the issues unfinishe d originally. the answer or swag come along. Here, the explicate in whatever case has been. specifically use, when way that the if the employees go on a conquer on a guinea pig. which was no unfinished originally the demo or broken town get on with, because it is not penal. his is antithetical from S. 23 (a) and S. 23 (b), which prohibits all kinds of holds if matter is unfinished before propitiation come along or content Tribunals and fag out judicial systems. \nThe research worker is not current somewhat the resolve why settles atomic number 18 willinged on a various subject than downstairs resolution or re accede wit beneath S. 23 and dis quited low S. 23 (a) and (b). Although S. 23 covers two strikes and lock-outs, nevertheless since strikes ar most(prenominal) third estate and pass frequently, so the present condition seems to save the employers to a smashing extent. to a lower place S. 23 (a) and S. 23 (b), the workers leav e be disallowed to go on strike on a metter which is more(prenominal) sobering than a matter downstairs rumination by the placation board or bear on Court or depicted object tribunal. This is vilify because, it can be used as a ploy to secure the workers to avouch on a just issue by winning light of a small issue. The researcher believes that it could not confound been the blueprint of the legislators of the operation to put autocratic forbiddance on strikes and lock-outs while a matter is pending infra S. 23 (a) and (b) and allow for strikes and lock-out when matter is pending on a lower floor S. 23 (c). So, the courts should afford a goal-directed edition and allow strikes and lock-outs on matters which are not nether condition by the conciliation Board or agitate courts and content tribunals. This would be in interest of both employers and the employees as both are cover downstairs S. 23. The cultivate of incorporated negotiate which has proceed a accepted rightfield should not be held warrantor to the double purvey of s. 23 (a) and s. 23 (b). function 24 unlawful Strikes and Lock-Outs \nStrikes when Illegal. infra s. 24, a strike will be illegal only if it is commenced or declare in difference of opinion of s. 22 or 23, or is continue in contravention of an cabaret make under s. 10(3) or 10A(4A) of the ID Act. \n'